Wednesday, April 12, 2006
National Review 1
When I started college in 1966 I discovered a
magazine in the college library that caught my
attention. That magazine was National Review
and the philosohy behind the publication was a
well reasoned, scholarly yet feisty conservatism.
The editor was the urbane, wtty. erudite,
William F. Buckley, Jr. a Yale educated Catholic
intellectual who was very serious about critiquing
the status quo from the perspective of a traditionally
grounded ethos and values. This was a very
stimulating publication, at times somewhat
over my head intellectually, but none-the-less
enriching and thought stretching.
National Review was a magazine with an agenda.
This publication set out to develop a modern
coherent conservative political and cultural
philosophy as well as critiquing the prevailing
establishment liberalism. It was deeply
anti-communist and was certainly compatible
with what I had learned from Carl McIntire
and Billy James Hargis. I began subscribing
to it and continued to do so for 25 or 30 years.
The college I went to was not one that was friendly
to conservative thought and my bi-weekly doses
of National Review helped me keep a right
perspective during the turbulent late 1960s
and early 1970s.
magazine in the college library that caught my
attention. That magazine was National Review
and the philosohy behind the publication was a
well reasoned, scholarly yet feisty conservatism.
The editor was the urbane, wtty. erudite,
William F. Buckley, Jr. a Yale educated Catholic
intellectual who was very serious about critiquing
the status quo from the perspective of a traditionally
grounded ethos and values. This was a very
stimulating publication, at times somewhat
over my head intellectually, but none-the-less
enriching and thought stretching.
National Review was a magazine with an agenda.
This publication set out to develop a modern
coherent conservative political and cultural
philosophy as well as critiquing the prevailing
establishment liberalism. It was deeply
anti-communist and was certainly compatible
with what I had learned from Carl McIntire
and Billy James Hargis. I began subscribing
to it and continued to do so for 25 or 30 years.
The college I went to was not one that was friendly
to conservative thought and my bi-weekly doses
of National Review helped me keep a right
perspective during the turbulent late 1960s
and early 1970s.